Vol 32| Issue 2 | July – Dec 2019 | page: 31-38 | Suresh S Pillai, Harisankar M, Jaifer K
Authors: Suresh S Pillai , Harisankar M , Jayafar K 
 Department of spine surgery, Baby memorial Hospital, Calicut, Kerala, India.
 Department of Orthopaedics, Baby memorial Hospital, Calicut, Kerala, India.
 Consultant Orthopedic surgeon, Calicut, Kerala, India.
Address of Correspondence
Dr. Suresh S Pillai,
Baby memorial Hospital, Calicut, Kerala, India.
Sagittal balance is a biomechanical feature of bipedal human spine which maintains the centre of gravity between the two legs for an energy efficient ambulation. A lot of compensatory mechanisms develop when there is loss of sagittal balance like loss of segmental lordosis, hyperextension at other lumbar segments, retrolisthesis, retroversion of pelvis, increased pelvic tilt and reduced sacral slope. Intrinsic pelvic morphology (pelvic incidence) determines the ability to compensate.
In degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis pelvic parameters definitely matter. A high pelvic tilt is correlated with poor clinical outcome, poor quality of life and complications after surgery. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis without instability or with single level degenerative listhesis does not cause much imbalance. Patients with multilevel degenerative disc disease, and degenerative scoliosis occurring along with degenerative spondylolisthesis requires restoration of lumbar lordosis by sagittal realignment procedures. Sagittal balance is essential for energy efficient posture, gait and function.
We have done a prospective study to assess the correlation between recurrence of symptoms and sagittal spine pelvic imbalance in lumbar intervertebral disc prolapse. It was observed that the recurrence of symptoms of lumbar IVDP was significantly correlated with sagittal spinopelvic imbalance (p value < 0.001).
Keywords: Sagittal balance, Spinal deformity, Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis, Recurrence, IVDP, Pelvic incidence, Lumbar lordosis.
1. Dubousset J. Three-dimensional analysis of the scoliotic deformity. The pediatric spine: principles and practice. 1994;
2. Terran J, Schwab F, Shaffrey CI, Smith JS, Devos P, Ames CP, et al. The SRS-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification: assessment and clinical correlations based on a prospective operative and nonoperative cohort. Neurosurgery. 2013;73(4):559–568.
3. Vrtovec T, Pernuš F, Likar B. A review of methods for quantitative evaluation of spinal curvature. European spine journal. 2009;18(5):593–607.
4. Johnson RD, Valore A, Villaminar A, Comisso M, Balsano M. Sagittal balance and pelvic parameters–a paradigm shift in spinal surgery. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 2013;20(2):191–196.
5. Lamartina C, Berjano P, Petruzzi M, Sinigaglia A, Casero G, Cecchinato R, et al. Criteria to restore the sagittal balance in deformity and degenerative spondylolisthesis. European spine journal. 2012;21(1):27–31.
6. Vialle R, Levassor N, Rillardon L, Templier A, Skalli W, Guigui P. Radiographic analysis of the sagittal alignment and balance of the spine in asymptomatic subjects. JBJS. 2005;87(2):260–267.
7. Roussouly P, Pinheiro-Franco JL. Sagittal parameters of the spine: biomechanical approach. European Spine Journal. 2011;20(5):578.
8. Morvan G, Mathieu P, Vuillemin V, Guerini H, Bossard P, Zeitoun F, et al. Standardized way for imaging of the sagittal spinal balance. European Spine Journal. 2011;20(5):602.
9. Ghandhari H, Hesarikia H, Ameri E, Noori A. Assessment of normal sagittal alignment of the spine and pelvis in children and adolescents. BioMed research international. 2013;2013.
10. Cavanilles-Walker JM, Ballestero C, Iborra M, Ubierna MT, Tomasi SO. Adult spinal deformity: sagittal imbalance. International Journal of Orthopaedics. 2014;1(3):64–72.
11. Mendoza-Lattes S, Ries Z, Gao Y, Weinstein SL. Natural history of spinopelvic alignment differs from symptomatic deformity of the spine. Spine. 2010;35(16):E792–E798.
12. Bridwell KH. Causes of sagittal spinal imbalance and assessment of the extent of needed correction. Instructional course lectures. 2006;55:567–575.
13. Roussouly P, Nnadi C. Sagittal plane deformity: an overview of interpretation and management. European spine journal. 2010;19(11):1824–1836.
14. Gille O, Challier V, Parent H, Cavagna R, Poignard A, Faline A, et al. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Cohort of 670 patients, and proposal of a new classification. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2014;100(6):S311–S315.
15. Le Huec JC, Aunoble S, Philippe L, Nicolas P. Pelvic parameters: origin and significance. European Spine Journal. 2011;20(5):564.
16. Rhee C, Visintini S, Dunning CE, Oxner WM, Glennie RA. Does restoration of focal lumbar lordosis for single level degenerative spondylolisthesis result in better patient-reported clinical outcomes? A systematic literature review. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 2017;44:95–100.
17. Kumar M, Baklanov A, Chopin D. Correlation between sagittal plane changes and adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion. European spine journal. 2001;10(4):314–319.
18. Lu A, Wang Z, Wang S. Spine-pelvis sagittal parameters and clinical efficacy before and after short-segment reduction and fusion surgery in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. International Journal Of Clinical And Experimental Medicine. 2018;11(4):3431–3438.
19. Park S-A, Lee J-H. Clinical Implications of Spino-pelvic Parameters for the Outcome of Spinal Surgery for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases. Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery. 2016;23(3):188–196.
|How to Cite this Article: Pillai S S, Harisankar M, Jayafar K | Sagittal Profile In Spinal Deformities And Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis | Kerala Journal of Orthopaedics | July – Dec 2019; 32(2): 31-38.